E-Cigarettes: Are They as Safe as the Public Thinks?
نویسنده
چکیده
© 2016 Harborside Press® An important part of our practice in oncology is assisting patients in smoking cessation and providing them with information about factors that increase their cancer risk. Smoking accounts for almost 90% of all lung cancers and as much as 30% of all cancer deaths (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2014). As advanced practitioners, we can influence the incidence, disease outcomes, and mortality rates of cancer by promoting smoking cessation. Over the past 20 years, smoking cessation programs and pharmacologic agents have been utilized to aid in tobacco abstinence. It is well understood that a combination of cognitive behavioral and psychological counseling plus pharmacologic agents provides the highest abstinence rates (Karam-Habe, Cinciripini, & Gritz, 2014). Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes)—often referred to as vapes, vape pens, or hookah pens—have been touted as a method of smoking cessation. These small, battery-operated devices use an electric heater that aerosolizes liquid nicotine (Cobb, Hendricks, & Eissenberg, 2015). This liquid usually contains other compounds such as propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, and flavorants. The amount of nicotine varies from much less to more nicotine when compared to regular cigarettes. These devices may or may not look like cigarettes; some may even look like a lighter or a pen, potentially enabling users to hide their nicotine use.
منابع مشابه
Who thinks what about e‐cigarette regulation? A content analysis of UK newspapers
AIMS To establish how frequently different types of stakeholders were cited in the UK media debate about e-cigarette regulation, their stances towards different forms of e-cigarette regulation, and what rationales they employed in justifying those stances. METHODS Quantitative and qualitative content analyses of 104 articles about e-cigarette regulation published in eight UK and three Scottis...
متن کاملWhy public health people are more worried than excited over e-cigarettes
The research field on e-cigarettes is characterized by severe methodological problems, severe conflicts of interest, relatively few and often small studies, inconsistencies and contradictions in results, and a lack of long-term follow-up. Therefore, no firm conclusions can be drawn on the harm of e-cigarettes, but they can hardly be called safe. Experimental studies indicate negative health eff...
متن کاملGenerally Recognized as Safe: Uncertainty Surrounding E-Cigarette Flavoring Safety
Despite scientific uncertainty regarding the relative safety of inhaling e-cigarette aerosol and flavorings, some consumers regard the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) designation as evidence of flavoring safety. In this study, we assessed how college students' perceptions of e-cigarette flavoring safety are related to understanding of the GRAS designati...
متن کاملCigarettes Butts and the Case for an Environmental Policy on Hazardous Cigarette Waste
Discarded cigarette butts are a form of non-biodegradable litter. Carried as runoff from streets to drains, to rivers, and ultimately to the ocean and its beaches, cigarette filters are the single most collected item in international beach cleanups each year. They are an environmental blight on streets, sidewalks, and other open areas. Rather than being a protective health device, cigarette fil...
متن کاملPerceptions of E-Cigarettes among Black Youth in California
Research suggests that Black youth are less likely to use e-cigarettes than their white counterparts, yet little is known as to why. We examined perceptions of e-cigarettes among Black young adults (ages 18-25) to explore the meanings these youth ascribe to e-cigarettes and the role that identity plays in how these devices are viewed. Analysis of in-depth interviews with 36 Black smokers and no...
متن کامل